The VAR officials have been slammed for their decision-making during Rangers' win over Kilmarnock.
Philippe Clement's side ran out comfortable 4-1 winners at Ibrox against the 10-men of Killie.
But Kris Boyd was left unhappy with the standard of officiating during the first half of the game, with the scoreline 1-1 at that point.
Matty Kennedy had Derek McInnes' side in the lead during a bonkers opening 20 minutes, which also saw Rangers miss a penalty and a controversial red card for the visitors.
Steven Kirkland was the main VAR for the top six encounter.
And when reviewing the VAR check for a Rangers penalty after only two minutes - which was eventually dismissed by on-field referee David Dickinson - Boyd raised questions over Kirkland.
Boyd explained: "Yeah and I am going to go back. I said the referee has had a shocker, he has made some bad decisions but I want to clear that up.
"It is the officials that have had a shocker. They are meant to be working as a team and I am looking at Steven Kirkland on VAR. That is not a penalty. This set the tempo.
"Fair play to David Dickinson for going over and continuing with his on-field decision but you look at the time it took to get to that. You can understand why the fans and everybody is frustrated. The inconsistency, you have got to be stronger.
READ MORE: Rangers vs Kilmarnock red card blasted live on BBC
"You don't want to speak down on people but you have got to ask yourself, 'What level of referee is Steven Kirkland? Why is he officiating VAR?' We have got full-time VAR referees. Why are they not operating our machines?"
Chris Sutton added: "I take Kris' points. The (Corrie) Nbada incident for handball was two and a half minutes. We could see it within, not that we know everything, most that know anything about football could see within 15 seconds.
"Why does it take that long? The early stages there was to much re-refereeing and that is not what we want."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here