WITH Tesco announcing their £3.7bn merger with wholesale food seller Booker in January, hedge funds and investment banks are now moving to take advantage of locational analysis to establish the financial impact of the merger.
The merger will result in Tesco’s share of the convenience store market increase to 28 per cent and, as with any intended merger of this size, the Competitive Markets Authority (CMA) is assessing the deal using geographic analysis.
The Mapmechanics consultancy team replicates the geographic analysis the CMA will carry out in advance, showing the business and trading landscape of both parties.
They examine the locations of convenience stores owned by Tesco Group, Booker Group and the competition, and analyse their geographical makeup to produce statistics and insights that reveal the extent of competition in the convenience store market.
This is crucial information for hedge funds and investment banks worldwide, indicating the possible consolidation of retail estates after the CMA’s official decision.
The geographical strategy uses a straight line analysis (crow flies) to reveal that 63 per cent (2,192) of Tesco Convenience stores lie within a mile of a Booker store.
Alternatively, using the analytical approach of the Office of Fair Trading in the case of the Costcutter-Mace merger (drive-time catchments between outlets) Mapmechanics found that there are zero Tesco Convenience stores where a Booker store makes up the only competition within a five-minute drive.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here