THE UK administrator of collapsed investment bank Lehman Brothers has warned the risks of another financial crisis loom large and said regulators would still struggle to contain investor panic.
A decade on from the start of the financial crisis, Tony Lomas – the PwC partner in charge of the administration of the bank – said the complexity of financial products means “there is always a risk” of another meltdown.
The failure of the US banking giant became one of the most famous and shocking moments of the crisis, spiralling the credit crunch into full-blown market chaos.
Despite the lessons learned over the past 10 years, Lomas said regulators would still find it hard to stop a firm going bust once investor and market confidence was lost.
It comes as a stark warning on the 10th anniversary of the crisis this week, as the UK is still suffering the effects of the aftermath with interest rates remaining at record lows and eye-watering levels of government borrowing.
Lomas said he hoped measures put in place in recent years and incoming ring-fencing rules to protect retail customer money would see another Lehman-style collapse picked up sooner and allow a more orderly wind-down. But he cautioned: “Once the market has lost confidence in a financial institution, it rapidly deteriorates and I find it hard to see how you can restore that. I find it hard to imagine that you can stop that rush of business out the door by various devices that have been introduced over the past six or seven years.”
He joined other prominent figures, including former chancellor Lord Darling, in warning of ever-present risks of another crisis.
“Experience is lost and people retire – in their exuberance, people enter the fray with new ideas for products and services and complexity is a hallmark of it,” said Lomas. “As long as it’s complex, there’s always a risk (of another financial crisis).”
Lehman Brothers went bankrupt in September 2008, just over a year after the credit crunch began.
Its failure was compared to a “massive earthquake” by one dazed worker, walking out of the offices after its collapse shocked global markets.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here