THE chief executive of Royal Bank of Scotland has pledged to help tackle a lack of diversity in British boardrooms by combating a “too white and too male” culture.
Ross McEwan said the bank, which is 72 per cent owned by the taxpayer, has made strides in promoting women into senior roles but admitted it still has work to do in ethnic diversity.
“We’ve set ourselves the target of having initially 30 per cent of our top 700 executives as females by the end of 2020.
“We actually reached that target last year, so have changed the target to make it more difficult.
“Ethnicity, I think, is a big issue for this organisation.
“We need to be reflecting the types of people our customers are.
“Too white and too male is something that we’re now starting to concentrate on. I think it’s beyond the male and female and I think there are a lot of other areas that we should be thinking about as well,” McEwan said.
His comments come in the same week data from Green Park showed 58 per cent of FTSE 100 boardrooms still have no ethnic minority representation.
It follows the Government-backed Parker Review, which found “disproportionately” low levels of diversity across UK boardrooms.
The review, which was released in November last year, subsequently recommended one director of colour be appointed to each FTSE 100 company by 2021, and to each FTSE 250 board by 2024.
Similar recommendations on gender-based recruitment were made by the Davies review in 2015, saying women should make up a third of every FTSE 100 boardroom by 2020.
McEwan added that RBS is working with interest groups to make changes and will publish statistics on gender pay in September.
“Really what you look at, job for job with the experience, are the people being paid the same?
“That’s what I’m interested in and that’s what we review on an annual basis.
“Are people doing the same job getting the same pay, as opposed to how many females have I got in more clerically oriented roles versus people in management?”
He said the bank now wants 30 per cent female representation in every part of the business, particularly in areas such as NatWest markets, where it has “been pretty male dominated”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here