THE number of Uber drivers in London should be capped to ensure “healthy competition and consumer choice”, the boss of a rival minicab app has claimed.
Kabbee chief executive Justin Peters called for a limit on the proportion of minicab drivers overseen by one company if Uber overturns a decision not to renew its operating licence.
Some 116,000 minicab drivers hold licences in London and Uber says around 40,000 use its app in the city.
Transport for London (TfL) refused to renew the firm’s licence last month on the grounds of “public safety and security implications”.
Uber has said it will launch an appeal against the decision. It can continue to operate during that process.
Peters has written to London mayor and TfL chairman Sadiq Khan, warning it is “very dangerous” to allow a private company to hold a monopoly in the transport sector.
In the letter, the Kabbee boss wrote: “There should be a cap on the overall percentage of the minicab driver supply that can be overseen by an individual company.
“This will ensure healthy competition and consumer choice forever. I am guessing this would also reflect the desired outcome of the Government too.”
In explaining its decision not to renew Uber’s licence, TfL said it had concerns over the company’s approach to reporting serious criminal offences, how drivers’ medical certificates are obtained, how criminal record checks are carried out and its use of technology which allegedly helps it to evade law enforcement officials.
Peters said Uber’s licence should be renewed if it addresses the issues raised.
Theresa May last week described the proposed outlawing of Uber in London as a “disproportionate” move that puts thousands of jobs at risk.
But Peters said Uber drivers would “quickly secure ongoing work” as long as they were of the same quality of other minicab companies.
A spokesman for Uber said: “We’re proud to have brought more choice and competition to this industry.
“With Uber, licensed drivers can choose if, when and where they drive and are totally free to work with other operators in London too.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here