HOUSE of Fraser is locked in last-ditch discussions with its lenders as it scrambles to avoid a calamitous administration that would put thousands of jobs at risk.
The department store chain hopes to launch a store closure programme next week, but insiders say the company is drawing up contingency plans for an administration. House of Fraser’s collapse would endanger 17,000 staff across its 59 stores.
Founded as Arthur and Fraser in Glasgow in 1849, it has four stores in Scotland – Frasers in Edinburgh and Glasgow and Jenners in Edinburgh and at Loch Lomond Shores.
The group is racing to secure £70 million in fresh funding through a proposed rescue plan. If the money does not materialise, House of Fraser could file a notice to appoint administrators within days, one source said. The company is holding crisis talks with HSBC and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China over the weekend, after the lenders expressed concern about the business’ bid to secure the money from a new investor.
The lenders, advised by EY, are demanding assurances that Hamleys owner C.banner will follow through on a promise of new funding when it takes a majority stake in the business.
C.banner has pledged the cash injection on the condition the retailer pushes through a sweeping store closure programme via a Company Voluntary Agreement (CVA). However, the store closures require approval from House of Fraser’s landlords, who have not been supportive of the CVA.
House of Fraser has been holding talks with landlords in a desperate bid to secure their approval, fearing they could vote against the CVA. House of Fraser needs 70% of creditors to back the plan, and has also been seeking the approval of the Pensions Regulator.
It is thought that about 20 House of Fraser stores could close if the CVA goes ahead. A House of Fraser spokesman said: “Constructive engagement continues between all parties.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel