THE Scottish Government this week launched a consultation into the future of farm and rural funding in Scotland post-Brexit.
The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) accounts for the biggest single slice of the EU budget, accounting for 38% of all the money spent across Europe, and it has underpinned our farming system for over 40 years.
The CAP isn’t just about direct payments to farmers, but includes a whole raft of wider measures supporting our rural areas and rewarding the things the market doesn’t pay for, such as reforesting farmland, maintaining waterways, creating natural habitats for wildlife, and supporting young people into farming. So it’s pretty urgent that we decide what will replace it.
Greens are proudly pro-Europe, and will defend our membership of the EU right up until Brexit day and beyond. But that doesn’t mean we don’t have criticism of the EU, and the CAP is one of the areas where Greens across Europe have fought for reform for many years.
Too often, it puts public funds in the hands of the big agri-businesses that need them least, and it has struggled to adapt to the changing landscape emerging due to climate change. The opportunity we have now to design our own system is a precious chance to show the rest of the EU what a sustainable system of farming support would look like. We can begin again, laying a vision for a system which produces healthy food, uses our natural resources wisely, maintains and enhances our native ecosystems, and helps repopulate the straths and glens that have lain empty for generations.
Sadly, the consultation launched this week by Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing contains none of this vision. It takes our current system as the starting point, and looks to make as few tweaks and “streamlinings” (read cuts) as possible. There is no discussion on the principles that should underpin our farming system, and it proposes a “business as usual” model focused purely on economic growth.
We could be doing so much more, and delivering on the things that really build vibrant rural communities, such as access to land, good local services, and a clean, diverse, thriving environment.
We often that hear farming faces a crisis due to a lack of new and young people wanting to farm. However, last year a survey by the Scottish Farm Land Trust found that nearly 1000 people in Scotland wanted to set up farm businesses but were unable to access land. Our crisis is due not to a lack of interest, but to our current standard model of farming which has huge start-up costs, high rates of solitary working and little financial reward.
A more diverse mix of smaller farms, who might combine food production with other rural businesses such as crafts, tourism or home-based services, could help fulfil this demand for new farmers and boost our rural population significantly in the process.
Mechanisms such as tethering farm payments according to size, and supporting job creation in sectors like market gardening could help achieve this, but we need to combine it with the radical land reform agenda currently being championed in Scotland.
We do, however, face a real crisis in our post-Brexit food supply – particularly regarding fruit and vegetables. We know we should be consuming more of these yet many families already struggle to access them. We only grow 58% of all the vegetables eaten in the UK, with the rest filled overwhelmingly by imports from the EU. A no-deal Brexit could see import tariffs of 40% slapped on to them overnight.
Fruit and veg production gets some of the lowest levels of support under the current system, so we need to think urgently about what we can do to increase this. Public money should be directed towards healthy food production, not subsidising mass production of biofuels or barley for malting into whisky.
We also need to seriously look at how we reduce our dependence on synthetic fertilisers and pesticides. When we talk about the carbon footprint of agriculture, we usually think about emissions from animals and the carbon released by tilling the soil. But we forget that much of our agriculture routinely overuses fossil-fuel based fertilisers and, as with the energy sector, we need to see a transition to renewable and organic methods fast.
At the first session of the Scottish Parliament, Green MSP Robin Harper proposed a bill to introduce ambitious organic targets for farmers. If we had adopted that world-leading legislation, we would be well on the way to de-carbonising our farming system.
When one in five mammals in the UK faces extinction, we know we need to change radically the way we manage our countryside. Now is our opportunity to do this. If Fergus Ewing won’t lay out a path to achieve this, the Scottish Greens will.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel