LIFE in Yemen is a daily battle against poverty, crippled infrastructure, shortages of food, water and medicines – and British-made bombs.
Before the Saudi-led coalition entered the fray in March last year, almost half of the population was already living below the breadline, with two thirds of young people jobless and basic social services hanging by a thread.
Even at that point it was estimated that more than 60 per cent of the population – 16 million people – needed humanitarian aid.
But since the bombing began, things have got unimaginably worse, and all the while the world turns its eyes away.
Earlier this week the Health and Population Office in the Marib province warned of an imminent collapse of the health care system due to the acute shortage of medicines.
Several facilities have been forced to stop treating patients, despite the urgent and ongoing need.
Across the country around 2.5 million people have been displaced and 10 of the 22 provinces were given “emergency” ratings in late 2015 – one step below “famine” as all but a tiny fraction of the country’s food imports have stopped.
To put this in context, before fighting began Yemen imported more than 90 per cent of its food.
Now two million are acutely malnourished, including 1.3 million children, with three million in need of treatment or preventative services for malnourishment and 7.6 million considered “severely food insecure”.
Meanwhile, imports of the fuel used to maintain the water supply have been restricted and more than 19 million now cannot access safe, clean drinking water or sanitation.
Against this backdrop, disease is thriving – the World Health Organisation warns of increasing risk of death during childbirth and curable, preventative illnesses are on the rise.
In November a UN report found almost 8,900 verified reports of human rights violations, which breaks down to around 40 per day.
If it sounds desperate, critical, inhospitable, unbearable, inhumane, it is.
And yet the international community looks away, fails to act – a UN attempt to raise £1 billion for aid efforts launched in June had yesterday achieved just 56 per cent of its total.
Yes, £1 billion is a lot of money, David Cameron can tell you that – it is exactly the same sum generated for the UK coffers in arms sales to Saudi Arabia in just three months.
The war in Yemen is big business, but if Cameron’s treatment of the subject in the House of Commons is anything to go by, it is not a major concern. These are not British lives. This is not a British struggle. This is not, as he has repeatedly asserted, a British war.
And yet UK weapons, UK personnel, UK politicians are entrenched in this conflict, whether at factory, operations room or Downing Street level.
Yesterday the Yemen Post newspaper spoke of “blood on UN hands for being silent as 2,000 children” were killed over 10 months.
That silence cannot continue and Cameron’s questionable rhetoric – that aiding the air strikes makes the UK safer – must also be challenged.
UN report: Civilians targeted in Yemen by UK-built bombs
Alyn Smith: We’re not the good guys if we keep selling arms to Saudi Arabia
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here