DAVID Cameron has one thing going for him, as Ed Miliband recently found out to his cost. Whatever you think of the Tory leader (and we think very little), you could always say this: he looked like a Prime Minister.
We may never look at him the same way again. In one fell, ham-flavoured swoop, Lord Ashcroft has had his bloody revenge.
How on Earth can Cameron sit there now, at some grand summit of world leaders, without looking suspiciously at his tablemates, wondering if they’re picturing him in some indiscreet position of pig pleasure?
How can he stand up in Parliament and ask to be taken seriously? Jeremy Corbyn, suddenly, is twice the statesman. Ed Miliband had his own struggles with bacon, but at least they were reasonably civilised.
But whatever you make think of Cameron’s penchant for pork – and there may be little truth in it – some of Ashcroft’s other insights into the leader of this country are telling.
We will not criticise Cameron for having once taken drugs, though we might for inexplicably losing his zeal to relax drug laws once when he came within a sniff of power.
But to be part of a club which, to quote an unnamed MP, “was all about despising poor people” ... is this really the sort of man who can claim to be the champion of working families?
There was apparently a division at Cameron’s university between those students who “wanted to live the Brideshead lifestyle” and those who “wore donkey jackets in support of the miners”. We know whose side Jeremy Corbyn and Nicola Sturgeon would have been on. And we know who we want to run our country.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here