THERE are, of course, dangers inherent in political interference in the BBC.
This is particularly true in today’s climate, when the conservative government is using austerity as an excuse to drive home its political philosophy. One aspect of that philosophy is a deep distrust not just of the way in which the BBC does its job but of the principle of a public service broadcaster.
Nevertheless, while acknowledging those dangers it is still possible to see advantages in the radical plan outlined yesterday by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, not least for the BBC itself.
The corporation’s own research shows that less than half of Scottish viewers believe its output properly reflects their country.
The BBC’s referendum coverage almost certainly added that impression. But you do not have to be convinced of bias to be dissatisfied with the broadcaster. performance. “Regional” news programmes from which major stories are excluded and endless court reports are the norm leave the broadcaster in Scotland looking parochial, playing second fiddle to the “big beasts” in London.
The problem is that The BBC’s structure is remains dominated by London, with too little power devolved. outside that metropolis.
That must be the source of considerable frustration to staff. It certainly is for the viewer.
Sturgeon’s thought-provoking response to this problem deserves a considered reply. It will be interesting to see if one is delivered.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here