DOUNREAY has never been far from the headlines for one reason or another since the 1950s, when it was built to further the UK’s nuclear energy ambitions.
A cocktail of toxic leftovers now stored at the facility keeps it in the news now as another prime example of why some policies should be devolved as a priority.
Decisions are taken on nuclear waste – or to use the industry term “exotics” – hundreds of miles from where they are stored.
David Cameron attended a nuclear summit in Washington at the end of last month and announced that the biggest ever shipment of enriched uranium and spent nuclear fuel from Dounreay would be transported to the US.
In return, the US would send Europe a different type of uranium to be converted into medical isotopes, which, incidentally, we are told Europe is awash with.
We share Dr Paul Monaghan’s distrust of the UK Government and the Prime Minister’s role in this sorry episode.
That the Government should behave in such a cavalier fashion with such dangerous material defies belief and illustrates its disrespect for Scots and our country.
The exotics to be exported were never included in agreements on future transfer arrangements, and it would appear that Cameron – as well as making up policy on the hoof – has been putting political pressure on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority to force through policy changes.
In this case there is no question where decisions should be made on a matter of such importance.
We will have a new Scottish Parliament after May 5.
Let one of its first duties be to ensure that it is our MSPs who will call the shots on the safety of nuclear materials.
Anger flares on both sides of the Atlantic at Dounreay agreement over enriched uranium from Georgia
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here