THE SNP has everything to do with becoming independent and nothing to do with being independent. We all have our ideas for post-indy Scotland. The Growth Commission is an interesting contribution to that. But let’s not confuse these ideas with the argument for independence.
The argument for independence is simply that Scotland should make its own choices, regardless of what they turn out to be. It is the case for designing Scottish society according to the majority Scottish view, ie whichever election manifesto appeals to the majority.
If we don’t have the courage to make this argument then we should pack up and go home. By making this case we’re stating we’re up for it, that we will make the right choices for Scotland and if we don’t then we will use our native wit and intelligence to rectify the matter. We’re stating that we have the courage to fail.
By arguing over the detail of different post-independence plans we’re signalling that we’re worried and uncertain. Or, to quote William McIlvanney, we’re signalling that “we’re almost 700 years old and we’re still wondering what we want to be when we grow up”.
A movement’s success depends on the battles it chooses to fight. So let’s grow up, stop worrying and choose the right battle – the one which proclaims our wealth, our ambition, our confidence, our values; and our supreme confidence to overcome setbacks.
Frances Roberts
Ardrishaig, Argyll
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel