HOW easy would it be to match Graeme Eddie’s attempted refutation of the points I made in my response to his long letter (It is untrue that Israel survives due to US and Western power, The National, August 7) by descending into his “yah boo” point-scoring around puerile and pedantic semantics like “capture” and “annexation”, when we all realise that capture is what you do to implement annexation – ie the illegal occupation of another’s territory; which Israel indisputably did in Sinai during the 1967 war?
In Mr Eddie’s mind Israel can do no wrong. It is a paragon of virtue in the Middle East and it, and its policies, have had a benign impact on the strife within the region for 70 years. Well, good luck with that synopsis.
My formative years were instructed by the work of Leon Uris – Mila 18, Exodus, QB VII etc, which formed a significant part in building my belief in the equality of all, and lead my enquiring mind to probe the history of the time, and question it.
READ MORE: There is now no denying the apartheid state that is Israel
I have no antipathy to the plight and right of Jews; merely do I question why those with their experience have failed in 70 years, yes 70 long years, to build a bridge with their neighbours – hostility rather than peaceful co-existence; shamefully clearly of no concern to Mr Eddie and his ilk.
Isn’t the truth inescapable? Doesn’t Israel exist purely because it is in the Western powers’ interest that it does so? Haven’t their foreign policies propped the Israeli state up? I am not saying Israel shouldn’t exist; however doesn’t it need to mature in its approach, learn from experience and get its act together, to remove the omnipresent threat to peace and its existence?
Doesn’t it need to work diligently with the Palestinians for a peaceful solution, despite the difficulties, despite the intransigence on both sides and despite its dependence on Western powers’ foreign policy interests?
What perhaps depressed me most about Mr Eddie is his blind acceptance of the status quo in the Middle East, as if nothing should change; Israel 1 – peace 0.
I recall sitting in a hotel lounge at the edge of the Sahara desert on a holiday to Tunisia. On the television were pictures of a cruise missile being filmed passing by high-rise hotel windows on its way to civilian destruction during the Iraq war.
I was horrified at such a blatant abuse of power. Then I looked to some local men huddled in a corner, and the look on their faces said it all. Right there was the recruitment potential for a Daesh then still to be born. And time has shown that it was.
Unlike Mr Eddie, I don’t respect Western powers’ foreign policies in the Middle East. Iraq was a creation of the West; a bastard nation created by a committee. Kurds in the north split between Iraq and Turkey, Sunnis in the middle, and Shias in the South.
READ MORE: I have to speak out against the Israeli state ... I can’t stay silent on this slaughter
A recipe for disaster and only bonded by the brutal dictatorship of Hussein, with the approval of the Western powers, until he became too much of an embarrassment and something had to be done about him – project failure from the start.
I have no affinity for any religion, for me gods are a man-made creation, but I defend the right of anyone to worship as befits them. And no-one should be discriminated against, for religion or any other specious label attached to them.
But isn’t it time to seriously look at the Middle East and work for a resolution to the strife by respecting the rights of all? I may be wrong, but the State of Israel doesn’t suggest to me that it cares. Nor Mr Eddie.
Jim Taylor
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel