PAT Kane’s article (The philosophy of politics highlights the dilemmas of nationalist identity, August 11) is an interesting take on the different motives that can lie behind the desire for Scottish independence, but surely the dilemma is not quite as melodramatic as he believes, and it is possible, indeed necessary, to be an “existential” and “pragmatic” nationalist.
Nothing is certain in this life; an independent Scotland would be sure to get some things right and some things wrong; there would be good times and bad times; we may not rapidly become a template for progressive politics the world over – but we would be free.
Chris McEleny’s point is simply that a nation has an inalienable right to run its own affairs and to be free to make its own mistakes.
Pat, would you deny any other nation’s right to exist as a sovereign state if you didn’t approve of its policies? If the answer is “no”, then why would you deny it to your own? The solution surely, is simply this: help us achieve independence and then campaign, as all of us are free to do in a democracy, to convince others of the rightness of your political vision.
Jim Daly
Edinburgh
READ MORE: The philosophy of politics highlights the dilemmas of nationalist identity
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel