IT’S not often that I empathise with Boris Johnson, however I must do so in this case. As a woman who escaped an Islamic upbringing, I will state categorically that my stomach turns whenever I see “moving black tents”, as the writer Monica Ali called them. If satirical references are disrespectful, so be it. Disrespect is merited.
Let me be candid. Women did not invent a belief system that makes them second-class citizens by any standards that well-meaning liberal apologists apply to other areas. It was a man who invented Islam just as it was men who invented Judaism and Christianity.
Islam permits and in some cases advocates polygamy, temporary marriages, concubinage, wife beating, child marriage, reduced inheritance rights for women, and states that a woman’s testimony in court is worth half of that of a man. In my view the term Islamophobic is a contradiction in terms. A phobia is an unreasonable fear. It is not unreasonable to fear a belief system that maintains gender apartheid in the 21st century, with detailed prescriptions for every aspect of life.
If you bring up a little girl to believe that her body is a source of evil temptation to men, and she must cover every part of it except her eyes (some Mullahs believe that only one eye should be uncovered), you will find that some grow up to feel unclean if they walk in public with any part of their humanity visible. This is the reality behind the so-called free decision of some women to wear the burqa. And many, many women are compelled to do this, particularly those brought to Britain as polygamist wives, unable to speak English and totally disempowered. Evidence has been presented to a Westminster Parliamentary committee that 80% of Muslim marriages in London are being carried out in religious services by Mullahs on such a polygamous basis.
The burqa should be banned in the UK on several grounds:
It prevents the absorption of vitamin D, enough of a problem for dark-skinned people like me even without a face covering.
It contravenes normal security rules (you can’t wear a balaclava in a bank or normally cover your face for a passport).
Permitting it validates gender apartheid.
There are two huge problems for apostates: one is the privilege awarded religious belief systems when it comes to equalities issues. A “get out of gaol free” card. The second, and most ironic, is that left-wing individuals who abhor chauvinism in the ‘”white” population will do anything but condemn it in “minority” cultures. Their fear of being racist makes them view Islam through rose-tinted spectacles. Unfortunately some of The National’s columnists fall into this category. I would ask them to read the apostate Ibn Warraq’s excellent book Why I Am Not a Muslim, which certainly counters the narrative of Islam (almost from its inception a faith of conquest) being a religion of peace.
In my family, the burqa was not used. However, whereas my brothers were allowed to run about in warm weather, cool and comfortable in minimal Western clothing, like my mother I had to wear long trousers and long-sleeved tunics. I was taught that my hair, unlike my brothers’ hair, was temptation for men and it was my responsibility to protect males from being tempted. My sister still believes this, so strong is the indoctrination. If this psychological conditioning prevails in “moderate” Muslim families like mine, you can imagine the impact in more extreme families.
Finally, I would remind readers that when slavery was abolished in the US, not all slaves wanted to be free. Some clung to the chains that bound them. Abolition was not rescinded on that basis.
Amina Abu-Araffeh
Address supplied
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here