RANGERS may have won their first top-tier game for over four years but if they want to get back to the good old days and challenge for the title then they will need to do a lot better than this.
Mark Warburton’s men should have had this match won before half-time. That they did not and allowed Dundee – who had been awful in the first period – back into things, would not have gone unnoticed.
Rangers were 2-0 up, missed a great chance to go three ahead, gifted Dundee a goal, which their defence is prone to do, and then passed up another opportunity to make it 3-1.
Of course, a win is a win and all that. Rangers actually played well for half an hour and scored two fine goals. But they have to find a way of making life easier for themselves.
“We were resilient in the second half but we shouldn’t have needed to be,” admitted Warburton. “I thought for the last half hour of the first half we were excellent. We scored two goals and should have scored more.
“We lost a goal from a set-piece, which was disappointing, and we then wanted to come out and replicate the first half and dictate the game, but that didn’t happen. I think we went down a gear and we will learn from that. We spoke about it in the dressing room.
“You could see in that first half what that squad are capable of. We were hesitant and nervous in the second half. However, it’s a win and on the second game of the season at a difficult place.”
While neither side were particularly great in the opening stages, it was the Dundee players who caused their manager the most angst. Judging by the waving of arms and shouting, Paul Hartley thought his team couldn’t do a thing right.
His mood was not helped by Rangers taking the lead on 16 minutes. Barry McKay fed a pass inside the Dundee box to James Tavernier, the defender’s cutback eventually fell at the feet of Harry Forrester whose shot ended up in the top corner despite him being on the ground when he flicked his leg at the ball.
Rangers were well in command and got a second on 39 minutes when Lee Wallace made a fine run into the box. He crossed for Kenny Miller, when he could have elected to shoot, and the veteran striker lashed the ball home with his left foot from the edge of the box.
Then a minute later Miller missed an easier chance when clear through on goal when it looked for all the world as if he’d taken the ball around Dundee goalkeeper Scott Bain, only for the ball to be stolen from his feet.
And right at the end of the half, after brilliant work from Forrester, Miller was given the chance to shoot ten yards out and dead centre of goal, but his effort was blocked and cleared. He took the difficult chance and missed two easy ones.
It hurt his team because, before his second miss, Dundee got back into the game. The corner from Danny Williams was an inviting one for the attacking side, but surely one Rangers defender could have gone for the ball which was headed in unmarked by Mark O’Hara.
The second half was a different affair. A long ball from Dundee keeper Bain on 62 minutes allowed Williams to get behind Danny Wilson, he tried to get past Foderingham, the ball bobbled up and ended up in the goalkeeper’s hands.
Forrester had a good game but, after a booking for catching Darren O’Dea, he committed two more fouls and was subbed before referee Craig Thomson booked him for a second time. A lucky boy.
Dundee felt aggrieved that Rangers were not put down to ten men. A goal would have lifted the clouds and they came close.
On 70 minutes, a poor kick by Foderingham meant the ball was back at him in the blink of an eye courtesy of a shot by Dundee substitute Yordi Teijjse who also saw a header go over. Wilson was also forced to clear from under his own bar as the Rangers defence again stuttered.
“I thought there were a lot of positives, a lot of pleasing aspects, and felt we really gave Rangers a game,” said Hartley, who wasn’t interested in getting into whether Forrester should have been red carded.
“Overall I was pleased. There were good performances from us. We have lost Kane Hemmings and Greg Stewart [in the past two weeks], that’s 40 goals between them, and it is my job to replace them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel