SCHOOLS should be allowed to make all decisions about children’s learning and school life, a education body has suggested, claiming such a move could make an “indispensable contribution” to closing the attainment gap.
The Commission on School Reform, set up by think tank Reform Scotland, suggested head teachers get greater powers, including in key areas such as budgets and staffing.
Teachers’ leaders in the EIS union dismissed the claim, though, and said the “greatest barrier to educational equality is and has been the imposition of austerity-driven budgets and the under-funding of the Scottish education system”.
In its submission to the Scottish Government’s consultation on school governance, the commission said: “If head teachers are to lead schools effectively and be held responsible for their actions, it is imperative that they should have the final say on staff appointments and should be able to remove staff who are surplus to requirements or not performing satisfactorily.
“Empowering schools is the single most effective way of challenging the current culture of conformity and compliance in Scottish education, and encouraging in its place a culture of innovation and improvement. It can make an indispensable contribution to the government’s aims of raising standards overall and closing the attainment gap between disadvantaged and other young people.”
While the aim of changes should be “to devolve full control of staffing matters to a local level”, the commission added setting up clusters of schools to handle such matters “could well become a practical necessity”.
The commission – which is chaired by former council director of education Keir Bloomer – stressed it did not want all decisions on education to be taken at school level but said “the assumption should be made that all decisions relating to ‘children’s learning and school life’ should be taken in school unless strong arguments are advanced to the contrary”.
With most schools run by councils, Scotland’s largest teaching union warned a “significant restructuring” of the relationship between government and local authorities could be “a significant distraction from the real needs of Scottish education”.
The EIS said it “supports the current structure and division of responsibility within Scottish education”.
It also insisted national conditions of service for teachers and other education professionals should remain in place, with its submission to ministers warning: “If staffing issues and funding are devolved to school level, the impact on the education industrial relations environment would be significant and, in our view, would not contribute to either excellence or equity.”
EIS general secretary Larry Flanagan said: “Scottish councils have always provided a mechanism for ensuring a level of local democratic accountability which, for us, remains an important principle as far as public service delivery is concerned.
“It is important that new initiatives, such as the £120 million in additional funding for attainment projects, are managed through these types of democratic structures to ensure fairness and transparency.
“The greatest barrier to educational equality is and has been the imposition of austerity-driven budgets and the under-funding of the Scottish education system over the past period.”
Bloomer, an education consultant, claimed: “The current arrangements for running our schools are sufficient to sustain a good education service, but not an excellent one.
“If we truly want to excel, and to close the opportunity gap for the 20 per cent of Scottish young people let down by the system, it needs transformational change.
“The commission believes there is a significant role to be played by the creation of school clusters, overseen by a board of trustees placing significant new expertise at schools’ disposal. This would be a truly Scottish solution to our Scottish problem.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “Our comprehensive programme of reform is based firmly on the independent findings of the 2015 OECD review of Scottish education which recommended... putting schools and communities at the heart of the education system.
“That is why we are reviewing school governance, and we will carefully consider all submissions to our consultation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel