INDEPENDENCE campaigners evicted from a camp on the grounds of the Scottish Parliament have been refused permission to take an appeal to the UK’s highest court.
The IndyCamp group set up a collection of caravans and tents outside Holyrood towards the end of 2015 and vowed to stay there until Scotland became independent.
It kick-started a court battle as the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body sought to remove them from the grounds.
Judges at the Court of Session in Edinburgh yesterday ruled in favour of the parliament last summer, and again later on after an appeal, paving the way for the eviction of the campaigners on November 4.
Despite being removed from the site, the IndyCamp group continued its legal battle against the earlier court rulings.
They returned to Scotland’s highest civil court to apply for permission to appeal to the UK Supreme Court.
Three Court of Session judges hearing the application, Lady Dorrian, Lord Menzies and Lord Glennie, did not grant the group permission to take their legal battle to London.
Speaking after the hearing, a spokesman for the Judicial Office for Scotland confirmed: “The Inner House of the Court of Session refused to grant permission to appeal as the court did not consider that the applications raised arguable points of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time.”
In civil cases where leave to appeal to the Supreme Court is refused, a party can still go on to apply directly to the London-based court for permission to appeal. It is understood the campaigners have 28 days in which to lodge any such application.
The group had argued its removal was unfair and objected to being evicted before the Supreme Court question had been dealt with.
Earlier hearings in the case saw unusual arguments aired in court, including claims that Jesus Christ had given permission for the camp.
A Scottish Parliament spokeswoman said: “We hope the protesters will accept the court’s ruling so we can bring matters to a close.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here