MALKY Mackay, the SFA performance director, and Stewart Regan, the SFA chief executive, are scheduled to meet with representatives of all 29 Club Academy Scotland members next week as Project Brave moves closer to becoming a reality.
The National understands that the final draft of the controversial strategy document, which envisages a dramatic cut in the number of young players in Scottish academies with resources being targeted at a select top tier of ‘performance’ academies, was approved on Tuesday by the association’s professional game board.
While consultation between Mackay, Regan, consultant Alistair Gray and local academy chiefs will now take place in a series of meetings the length and breadth of the country, assuming the plan also gets the assent of the Scottish Football Association’s main board, a bid document could be sent out to clubs as early as next month with a view to getting the new system up and running by as soon as 2018.
The plan, which would see all football between Under-11 and Under-16 level move to a March to November season, also envisages a dual age-band Under-18 league, and a development/reserve league in which clubs must play at least three over-age players.
The main source of intrigue for the layman remains exactly how many of these academies – which are set to have their SFA funding doubled to around £200,000 per annum for the duration of a five-year licence – will be granted access to the top tier under this reform.
While there has been speculation over two divisions of eight, in order to enshrine the principle of ‘best v best’, in fact the exact number has yet to be set, with each of Scotland’s academies instead being asked to declare an interest in taking part.
The final number will be determined by which clubs/academies opt to apply and the credibility of their bids but The National understands that the idea of an eight-club top tier is doomed and the final number could be 10, 12 or even greater.
In addition to a sustainable, underwritten business model for the five-year franchise, interested academies must meet minimum infrastructure standards – on number of coaches, qualifications and facilities – which have yet to be confirmed.
They will then be scored by a set of Measurable Performance Outcomes (MPOs) which rate them on a variety of factors such as the number of players produced for their first team, the first teams of other Scottish top sides and the amount of international players (age group or full ‘A’ squad) each academy has produced.
The devil is in the detail with even factors such as whether the MPOs in question are worked out over one season or aggregated over three seasons, potentially having major ramifications for interested academies on the cusp of inclusion.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here