AN influential UK parliamentary committee has called on Theresa May to investigate the risk of child trafficking before banning child refugees from Europe.
In a report published today, the cross-party House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee said the UK Government must urgently consult on the risk before making any changes to the Dubs scheme.
The call comes in response to the government’s controversial announcement in early February that it intended to limit the number of children who would be accepted into the UK under the scheme to 350 – 200 of whom had already arrived.
This number was far lower than the government’s original commitment, but it was claimed local authorities had only 350 places under the scheme.
However, the committee heard from local councils that more capacity was available and that if further funding was provided, they could provide up to a further 4,000 places.
The government said another reason for its decision on the Dubs scheme was because it was acting as “a pull” that “encourages the people traffickers”. However, the committee heard evidence from organisations including Unicef and Save the Children that closing the Dubs scheme would increase the risk of child trafficking and exploitation.
At the same time the Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner described the Dubs scheme as “an important, safe, legal route for unaccompanied refugee children” which had given sanctuary to children who had previously been exploited.
“There is a big gap between what the government has said, and the evidence we heard from local councils and from organisations like Unicef who are working with child refugees,” said committee chair Yvette Cooper MP. “This is too important to get wrong when children’s lives and futures are at risk. That’s why we are making these urgent interim recommendations now.
“Ministers have said that they need to end the Dubs scheme in order to prevent trafficking, but Save the Children and others have said this will make child trafficking, abuse and exploitation worse. That’s why we have called on the government to consult the expert Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner on his assessment of the risks of more trafficking if the scheme ends – after all, it is his job to prevent the kind of abuse and slavery we are all worried about.
“We also want ministers to publish all the council offers of help they have had, and to find out how many more children they could take in the next financial year.”
In response to the report, the SNP warned Theresa May that public and parliamentary pressure on the UK Government to resettle unaccompanied child refugees will not go away.
“The UK Government must immediately halt its shameful decision to end transfers under the Dubs scheme," said Stuart McDonald MP, SNP spokesperson on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control and SNP member of the Home Affairs Select Committee. "These are some of the most vulnerable children in the world and it is our duty to protect them. SNP MPs will not allow Tory ministers to put aside our values and shirk our responsibilities – this is about basic decency.
“The UK Government’s reluctance to act throughout the refugee crisis has been a cause for embarrassment – we certainly are not willing to let them roll back on the relatively weak commitments that they have made. As cross-party pressure grows we will continue to urge the UK Government to maintain the Dubs scheme and step up its resettlement efforts.”
SNP Westminster Leader Angus Robertson wrote to the Prime Minister last monthon February 17 calling for an urgent meeting to discuss the UK Government’s commitment to child refugees, but his request has so far been blanked.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel