COST-CUTTING plans by Network Rail will lead to the loss of up to 1,000 jobs on rail renewal work, unions have claimed.
Union leaders said planned cuts were “terrifying”, warning that crucial track replacement work will be cancelled, impacting on safety.
Network Rail said it had no plans to cut any safety-critical jobs or any safety-critical work, describing any such suggestion as “ridiculous scaremongering”.
A spokesman said: “The rail network has faced a number of cost pressures and changing priorities, and like all businesses we have to live within our means. This sometimes means making hard choices.
“We are making savings in non-essential areas to ensure we’re delivering value to the taxpayer, while at the same time continuing to deliver a safe, reliable and expanding railway.
“The safe running of the rail network will never be compromised.”
But the Rail, Maritime and Transport union said the railway infrastructure was already operating on a “knife-edge”.
General secretary Mick Cash said: “These planned cuts are a scandal and would impact on services and safety at a time when our railways are already running right at the limit of safety tolerances.
“Track that is past its safe operational sell-by date would not be replaced within safe time limits, running the risk of repeated failures and possible derailments. That is the Government, through the ORR [the rail regulator], playing fast and loose with rail safety.
“RMT wants an urgent meeting with Network Rail on this issue and the union will use our political, industrial and campaigning tools to halt these cuts.”
Manuel Cortes, leader of the Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association, said: “It is hugely disappointing for everyone engaged in efforts to build a better connected Britain that once again the short-sighted Tories are breaking spending promises and slashing and burning vital infrastructure projects and attacking a great workforce.
“It is terrifying that they are doing this with rail safety. Network Rail was created so rail safety standards could be rigorously maintained. These cuts must be resisted.”
Unions say they have been sent details of spending plans for the next two years, including reducing renewals, especially those that do not bring an “immediate safety or performance benefit”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here