DOZENS of people have been killed in a suspected chemical attack in a town in Syria’s northern Idlib province, opposition activists claimed.
The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group put the death toll at 58, saying there were 11 children among the dead. Meanwhile, the Idlib Media Centre said dozens of people had been killed.
Hours after the attack, a small field hospital in the region was struck and destroyed, according to a civil defence worker in the area. It was the third claim of a chemical attack in just over a week in Syria. The previous two were reported in Hama province.
The Syrian American Medical Society, which supports hospitals in opposition-held territory, said it had sent a team of inspectors to Khan Sheikhoun and an investigation was under way.
The Syrian activists had no information on what agent could have been used in the assault. They claimed the attack was caused by an air strike carried out either by the Syrian government or Russian warplanes. Russia’s defence ministry categorically rejected the claim that its planes attacked the town with chemical weapons.
The ministry said that “Russian air force planes haven’t dealt any strikes on Khan Sheikhoun in the province of Idlib”.
A Turkey-based Syrian woman whose niece, husband and one-year-old daughter were among those killed said the warplanes struck early, as residents were still in their beds. Makeshift hospitals soon crowded with people suffocating.
The province of Idlib is almost entirely controlled by the Syrian opposition. It is home to some 900,000 displaced Syrians, according to the United Nations. Rebels and opposition officials have expressed concerns that the government is planning to mount a concentrated attack on the crowded province. The reports came on the eve of a major international meeting in Brussels on the future of Syria and the region hosted by the EU’s High Representative, Federica Mogherini.
Claims of chemical weapons attacks, particularly the use of the chlorine agent, are not uncommon in Syria’s conflict. The worst attack was what a UN report said was an attack by toxic sarin gas in August 2013 on the Damascus suburb of Ghouta that killed hundreds of civilians.
The Syrian government has consistently denied using chemical weapons and chlorine gas, accusing the rebels of deploying it in the war instead.
Also, a joint investigation by the United Nations and the international chemical weapons watchdog determined the Syrian government was behind at least three attacks in 2014 and 2015 involving chlorine gas and the Islamic State group was responsible for at least one involving mustard gas.
The European Union’s top diplomat said Assad’s government must assume its responsibilities following reports of the attack in northern Syria. EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said that “the news is awful” and that Assad’s government “has the primary responsibility of protecting its people and not attacking its people”.
She said the attack “is a dramatic reminder of the fact that the first priority is, as in any conflict, stopping the fighting”.
Meanwhile, Britain is urging Russia and China not to block action against those responsible for the suspected chemical attack, which it is calling “a war crime”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here