ALMOST half of World Heritage Sites designated for their importance to nature are threatened by the illegal wildlife trade, a report from a leading conservation charity has warned.
WWF said poaching, illegal logging and fishing and trafficking of rare species are plaguing 45 per cent of the world’s most precious natural areas.
From Tanzania’s Serengeti to Ecuador’s Galapagos Islands, rare and endangered species are threatened by the illegal wildlife trade, which is estimated to be worth £15 billion globally, according to the report.
Poaching of species such as elephants, rhinos and tigers has been reported in at least 43 World Heritage sites, while illegal logging of valuable plants such as rosewood and ebony has been reported in 26 designated places.
Illegal fishing has been seen in 18 of the world’s 39 marine and coastal World Heritage sites.
Harvesting species protected under international law – from snow leopards to scaly anteaters or pangolins – is also a significant problem and occurs in around 50 per cent of African, Asian and Latin American sites, the report warned.
Natural World Heritage sites are home to a third of the world’s remaining tigers and 40 per cent of all African elephants, and in some areas are the last refuge for critically endangered species such as the Javan rhino.
Loss of species and habitat through illegal activity such as logging also threatens the services World Heritage sites provide to local people, from tourism jobs to clean water.
Deforestation has an impact on the planet as a whole by increasing carbon emissions.
Chris Gee, head of campaigns at WWF-UK, said: “Even the wildlife living in places which should benefit from the highest levels of protection are suffering at the hands of criminals.
“Not only does this threaten the survival of species, but it’s also jeopardising the future heritage of these precious places and the people whose livelihoods depend on them.”
He called for a united front from the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) and the World Heritage Convention to tackle the illegal wildlife trade.
And he said: “Next year London will host the fourth Illegal Wildlife Trade Conference, the UK Government must bolster efforts to support the end of this devastating trade.
“Now is not the time to drop the ball on this issue. These findings show that for the future of many of our most endangered species it’s a matter of life and death.”
Inger Andersen, director general of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), said: “Illegal wildlife trafficking robs the world of its natural heritage, threatens local communities and hampers global efforts to reduce poverty.
“This report is a sobering reminder of just how far this type of organised crime can reach, extending even into the supposed safety of World Heritage sites.This is a global challenge that can only be tacked through collective, international action.”
A World Heritage Site is a landmark or area which has been officially recognised by the United Nations (UN), specifically by the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Sites are selected on the basis of having cultural, historical, scientific or some other form of significance.
They are also legally protected by international treaties.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here