FORMER Rangers boss Alex McLeish was not close to returning to Ibrox but had reservations about the prospect when approached by the club.
McLeish was manager of the Govan club between 2001 and 2006, winning the domestic treble in 2003, among other honours.
He was invited by the Gers board to discuss the position vacated by Mark Warburton in February, with the club eventually opting for Portuguese coach Pedro Caixinha.
McLeish was speaking at a William Hill media event at Hampden Park ahead of the Scottish Cup semi-final clash between Celtic and Rangers at the national stadium on Sunday.
Asked how close he was to becoming the Light Blues boss for a second time, he said: “I wasn’t close. I had doubts about it. I did speak to them and I said that if they were to come back and offer me it, I would like to speak further.
“It was a very casual chat. It wasn’t what I would call an interview, it was meeting old friends again and seeing where they were going with the club.
“They say don’t go back and that was in my mind but they asked to speak to me and it was worth listening to what they had to say.
“But I believe Pedro Caixinha was probably uppermost in their minds even at that time.
“I was never 100 per cent, ‘yes, I am going back to Rangers’.
“I wouldn’t have just walked straight back in without some further talks.
“It was totally different to when I first went. It just wasn’t for me at this time of my career.
“I felt that, there is a lot that goes with it as well, in terms of the other side of the actual football and training.
“There is a lot of politics and I don’t know if I needed that at this stage of my life.”
McLeish recalled his first game as Rangers boss adding: “I was determined to make sure that I could make a stamp on Rangers Football Club’s history and kept the positive things in my head rather than looking at the negative.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here