ONE of Rolf Harris’s alleged victims said she was speaking out for “vindication and justice” as the entertainer sat in court for the first day since his trial began.
Harris, 87, is accused of touching the then 13-year-old schoolgirl after he appeared in a broadcast of the BBC’s Saturday Superstore in 1983.
He also allegedly asked the young teenager if she was often molested on a Saturday morning, which his defence team claimed had been said as a joke.
It is the first time the jury has seen the Australia-born former television star, who was released from HMP Stafford on Friday morning, in person for his indecent assault trial at Southwark Crown Court.
The complainant, who gave evidence via video link as Harris followed with a hearing loop, was quizzed about her motives for coming forward 30 years after the alleged incident.
Asked by prosecutor Jonathan Rees if she had made a claim for compensation, she said: “No I haven’t, and I don’t intend to.
“This has never been about compensation, it’s been about vindication and justice.”
She added that coming forward had been “the hardest thing I have ever had to do”.
Of the past few decades, she said: “It’s been an awful experience, and certainly not something I would do for any kind of fun or any other reason.
“All I want is entirely vindication and justice for the people these things happened to over the years.”
Harris denies four charges against three women between 1971 and 1983.
His niece Jenny looked on as the entertainer, who previously appeared via video link, sat in the dock wearing a dark suit and patterned tie.
He is expected to follow the rest of proceedings in person. The court heard the alleged victim made her official complaint in July 2014, the same day the Daily Star website ran a piece with the headline “Victims of Rolf Harris to receive £200,000 in compensation”.
She said she had not been aware of the headline as she was “not really a Daily Star reader”.
The woman said she had been aware of people claiming compensation, but not of the exact sums of money.
Asked why she waited so long to come forward she replied: “Because it is quite a decision to make, to come forward when you haven’t been believed by members of your own family and others ... it takes a while to make a decision to come forward and talk to the police.”
The court was also told that Harris was joking when he allegedly asked the young girl if she was often molested on a Saturday morning.
Stephen Vullo QC asked the complainant: “So it’s clear I don’t dispute on Mr Harris’s behalf he may have said something to you along the lines of ‘do you like to be molested on a Saturday morning?’ or something like that, but he would have said that in a jokey fashion while maybe marching you up and down the corridor?” She replied: “No absolutely not,” adding: “I fail to see, whether it is said to a group or a single child, how that can be misconstrued as a joke in any way.”
The alleged victim’s husband told the court that compensation had never been a goal for his wife.
He said he first became aware of what his wife was claiming when she shouted “pervert” at the television in her flat when Harris appeared on it, at some point before 2000.
He was then “shocked” as she went on to tell him she had been touched by the entertainer on Saturday Superstore.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here