THE Scottish Government has denied it plans to bypass universities when tendering for new routes to teacher training after a union raised concerns.
The Government is spending £1 million on ways to attract people into teaching and intends to put a new initiative out to tender aimed at attracting high-quality graduates in priority areas and subjects. This has led to fears a lower-quality fast-track scheme would emerge. The Educational Institute of Scotland is expected to debate an emergency motion on the issue at its annual general meeting in Perth today.
The proposed motion states: “This AGM condemns the recent decision of the Scottish Government to tender for new approaches to ITE [initial teacher education] which would bypass universities and calls on [the EIS national] council to campaign against any proposals which would reduce the current balance between academic and practical placements.”
EIS general secretary Larry Flanagan said there is a high degree of concern among members. He added: “The EIS has always strongly opposed any approach which places delivering education cheaply above guaranteeing quality education provision for all Scotland’s young people.
“The emergency motion set to be debated at the AGM confirms this position and reaffirms our very strong view that parachuting non-qualified people into schools is not a solution to the recruitment challenges that schools across Scotland are facing. We cannot dilute standards for the sake of political expediency.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said there were no plans to bypass universities for a fast-track teacher training scheme.
He said: “The approach referred to in the EIS motion is not our intention. Our plans are about attracting more people with the right skills and abilities to become teachers.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel