BRITISH firms are “totally unprepared” for Brexit and changes to immigration laws, a new survey has claimed.
Leading thinktank, the Resolution Foundation, say they have spoken to 500 business leaders, and have found a huge gap between the kind of immigration system employers expect and what the new government is planning for once Britain has left the European Union.
The poll of firms who employ EU nationals showed that almost half have “totally unrealistic” expectations of what the post-Brexit immigration regime might be, said the report.
Almost one in five expect no change to the current system of freedom of movement for EU nationals to the UK, while nearly a third believe that the system will be maintained for those with a job offer.
Almost half do not expect any change in the number of EU nationals in their workforce over the next 12 months.
A quarter expect to increase the number of migrant workers they employ, roughly the same proportion as expecting a decrease.
The Foundation said lower migration, coupled with a higher minimum wage and a tightening jobs market, could put an end to the era of readily-available cheap labour that has characterised the UK labour market in recent years.
Torsten Bell, director of the Resolution Foundation, said: “As the fallout from last week’s election rumbles on, the new government will need to be making fast preparations for Brexit negotiations that start in just seven days’ time. But it’s not just government that needs to step up preparation for Brexit.
“Many British firms are totally unprepared for this change, particularly when it comes to migration. Ministers have compounded this uncertainty by choosing not to answer questions over what a post-Brexit immigration regime might be.”
Bell, a former Treasury civil servant, added “Whatever people’s views on Brexit, the journey, not just the destination, matter hugely to growth, jobs and living standards.
“Now is the time for both firms and government to focus on how we navigate that journey and the changes to our labour market it brings.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here