INSPECTORS have delivered a damning report on the “dysfunctional” leadership of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) Bosses at the beleaguered body, who controls Police Scotland’s billion pound budget, have been under pressure for months over claims of bullying, secretive meetings, decisions taken in private and papers being kept from board members.
SNP MSP Alex Neil accused SPA bosses Andrew Flanagan and John Foley of acting like they were running the Kremlin.
The near-constant criticism of the body, in particular over how the resignation of board member Moi Ali was handled, saw justice minister Michael Matheson ask Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland (HMICS) to bring forward a planned routine inspection.
The interim report of that inspection, leaked to the Herald yesterday, concluded there was a “fundamental weakness” in governance arrangements at the SPA.
“HMICS considers that the current SPA internal executive structures are impacting negatively on the effectiveness and efficiency of the SPA to perform its statutory functions and must be addressed as a matter of urgency,” the report said.
HMICS added that there had been signs of improvement in SPA operations in recent months.
The report concluded the recent decision to move back to public meetings “has been made reluctantly and some members continue to believe their original approach is justified”.
“This is illustrative of an ongoing lack of appreciation amongst some members of stakeholder views and the need to secure public confidence in policing governance,” it said.
However, HMICS concluded the “primary” reason for restricting access to board papers had been to reduce press reports and said attempting to embargo papers was not desirable or sustainable.
HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary Derek Penman said: “The scrutiny of policing must not only be effective, it must also be seen to be effective.
“While there have been positive improvements under the current chair, the recent parliamentary scrutiny and media concerns over openness and transparency have weakened confidence in the SPA and detracted from its ability to perform its statutory function.”
Responding to the report, Flanagan, who resigned earlier this month, said: “SPA has already acknowledged recent mistakes made, has listened to the strengthened civic and public concerns around transparency and responded accordingly.”
Scottish Labour justice spokeswoman Claire Baker said: “A complete overhaul of the management structure at the SPA is now needed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here