A HEALTH board has apologised unreservedly after a probe found “multiple failings” in the care and treatment given to a baby who later died.
NHS Grampian said there were no excuses for its conduct in the case and admitted it had failed the family of the young boy.
The board said it accepts all of the recommendations put forward by the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO), which also found the board had failed to properly communicate with the child’s parents following the death.
The SPSO report, published yesterday, centres around the case of the child referred to as Baby A.
The baby’s mother, known only as Mrs C, complained to the SPSO about the care provided to her son at the Aberdeen Royal Children’s Hospital. The child had been fitted with a shunt, a medical device to relieve pressure on the brain, shortly after he was born.
His mother complained that when he was admitted to the hospital several months later, there were multiple failings in care and treatment. Her son died in a specialist paediatric neurosurgery centre at another health board a few days after his admission to the hospital.
Releasing its findings, the SPSO concluded: “Our investigation determined that there was a lack of clarity regarding the roles of each medical team and that there was a lack of communication between consultants when Baby A’s condition was not improving.
“We also found that the neurosurgical team had not kept reasonable records, nor had they appropriately assessed Baby A before and after operations.
“We identified significant delays in Baby A being reviewed after he underwent operations and a delay in clinicians contacting the specialist centre for advice on the management of Baby A.
“Finally, we considered there to have been a lack of communication from the neurosurgical team and Baby A’s parents.”
Summarising its findings, the ombudsman said: “There were multiple failings in care and treatment provided to Baby A when he became unwell in August 2015; and the board failed to reasonably communicate with Mrs and Mr C following Baby A’s death.”
The ombudsman issued nine recommendations to be acted on.Responding to the report, a spokeswoman for NHS Grampian said: “ It is clear we failed Baby A and therefore failed his family.
“The distress of the family was further compounded by the extremely poor standard of our communication with them.
“There can be no excuses for our conduct in this case and we apologise unreservedly.
“We accept all of the recommendations put forward by the ombudsman in this case.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here