DELIVERY firm Deliveroo has sparked a fresh row over the status of workers in the gig economy after calling on the government to update legislation.
The company said changes would give self-employed people greater security while maintaining the flexibility they want.
It said current employment laws prevents it from extending some of the entitlements that are open to “workers” without calling into question the status of its riders, who are classed as self-employed.
But unions countered that there was nothing stopping Deliveroo from paying its workforce the minimum wage and guaranteeing them basic rights like holiday and sick pay.
In evidence to a review of the gig economy by Matthew Taylor, Deliveroo said extending entitlements under the current law would undermine the flexibility that comes with riders being able to log in and log off at will, where they are paid according to work, not hours completed. It said that if riders were reclassified they would be required to work in compulsory sessions arranged with Deliveroo in advance, and to work exclusively for the company during those sessions.
Deliveroo is calling for a change in employment law that would allow it to offer new benefits to its riders, such as sick pay, insurance or shares for longstanding riders, describing it as a significant shift in UK employment practices.
Chief executive Will Shu said: “I still do deliveries every week so I know better than anyone the hard work that Deliveroo riders put in every day. It’s only right that they’re given the security they deserve whilst keeping the flexibility that they value.
“The on-demand economy has changed the way people work and live. We want an environment in which both workers and businesses benefit from the opportunities these changes provide.”
Taylor’s review is expected to be published next week.
Maria Ludkin, legal director of the GMB, said: “The only people who think the law is out of date are the companies like Deliveroo, who are trying to subvert the law and exploit workers. The law, when properly enforced, does the job of ensuring working people are paid national minimum wage and given the most basic employment rights.”
TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady said: “This reads like special pleading. Plenty of employers are able to provide genuine flexibility and security for their workforce. Deliveroo have no excuse for not following suit.
“The company’s reluctance to offer benefits now is because they want to dodge wider employment and tax obligations by labelling staff as self-employed.”
Neil Carberry of the CBI said: “It’s absolutely right that businesses engage in the debate about how we foster a labour market that drives growth and opportunity for everyone. We warmly welcome Deliveroo’s willingness to play a role in this, as it will help to move the discussion on to how to make the most of the opportunities of flexible forms of work, rather than demonising them as low-quality.”
Jason Moyer-Lee, of the Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain, said: “Deliveroo’s claim that unfortunately the law prevents them from giving employment rights and benefits is utter hypocritical nonsense.
“In case after case the law has come down on the side of workers in the gig economy. There is nothing to suggest, either logically or legally, that flexibility and employment rights are mutually exclusive.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here