WILLIE John McBride believes the British and Irish Lions may have been saved from extinction by the performance of this year’s side in New Zealand.
The Lions surprised the world champions by recovering from defeat in the first Test to claim a share of the spoils in a drawn three-match series.
The viability of the Lions, a composite side of four nations making a lengthy tour every four years, is often debated because of the position in the world game’s calendar.
But McBride, a star of the last Lions side to win a series in New Zealand in 1971, wants to see the concept preserved and thinks the performance of Warren Gatland’s team has underlined its important and unique status.
McBride told BBC Radio 5 Live’s Sportsweek programme: “It’s a tremendous achievement and, quite honestly, I think it has shocked a few people.
“A lot of people had written them off before they left because they didn’t really have enough time to put the team together. They have done a remarkable job.
“I think that this has, in many ways, saved the Lions.
“The concept is really unique and has gone now for well over 100 years. It would be dreadful in this professional era if it was ever messed around with.”
McBride believes Lions tours should be even longer. This summer’s schedule saw the Lions play three Tests and seven other matches over five weeks, a much shortened fixture list than in McBride’s day.
In 1971, for example, the Lions played 26 games, including four Tests, and were in New Zealand for three months.
“There are some tremendous players on this tour and they really haven’t had the time to gel together,” added McBride.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here