A SCOT wanted for murder in the US has lost his long-running legal battle against extradition.
Phillip Harkins, 38, has been fighting against his transfer to face the charge since 2003 in what has been described as Britain’s longest-running extradition case.
The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg rejected his final appeal yesterday.
Harkins had argued his extradition would violate articles three and six of the European Convention of Human Rights, relating to inhuman or degrading treatment and the right to a fair trial.
His lawyers said that if convicted in Florida he would face a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole.
The court declared both complaints inadmissible and said its decision was final. It also ruled an interim measure in place to stay Harkins’s extradition should be lifted.
Harkins, originally from Greenock, Inverclyde, was indicted for murder after Joshua Hayes was killed by a gunshot wound to the head during a robbery in Jacksonville, Florida, in 1999.
Harkins denies any involvement and has contested his extradition since it was requested by US authorities in March 2003. Harkins, who had been released on bail, returned to Scotland in 2002. He was jailed the following year for killing a woman in a road crash in Greenock.
After losing a number of attempts to block his extradition, Harkins took his case to the European Court of Human Rights, where an initial appeal failed in 2012.
Responding to the judgment, Hayes’s mother Patricia Gallagher told BBC News: “I really don’t understand how he was ever allowed to file that many appeals.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here