TOMMY Sheppard has argued the SNP made a fundamental error in their General Election strategy by insisting the campaign was not about independence. In a rare criticism of the leadership by a senior politician in the party, the MP claimed the downplaying of the SNP’s core objective led Yes voters to switch to Labour.
“Jeremy Corbyn was able to portray Labour as the engine for social change and talk of people power in a manner not dissimilar to the Yes campaign of 2014,” Sheppard said.
“For some, particularly young left-leaning voters in urban areas the attraction was undeniable. I know several people who told me they voted Yes in 2014, and for me in 2015, but this time they voted Labour because they wanted to endorse, and I guess, associate with the message he was putting out.
“And, of course, given the SNP spent most of the campaign saying the election was not about independence anyway then from their point of view what’s the harm in lending their vote to Jeremy.”
Sheppard’s comments were made in the annual Thomas Muir lecture, delivered in Edinburgh on Thursday night and published in full today by The National. He identified factors which led to his party losing 21 seats in the June 8 election and put forward ways to rebuild support.
He said: “Some 480,000 people who voted SNP two years ago declined to do so this time. In 2015, the SNP had more than 50 per cent of the vote in 35 of the 59 seats – now that figure is none. This was, by any measure, a political setback for the SNP.”
Sheppard added that to win back voters who had switched to Labour, the SNP needed to underline their uniqueness as the party of independence and to link that ambition to that of bringing about social change.
On timing of a new referendum, Sheppard said he would opt for obtaining “a new, clear and unconditional” mandate at the 2021 Holyrood election ahead of one “linked intrinsically to Brexit”. He said: “This scares some in the Yes movement who fear pro-independence parties may lose a majority in the 2021 parliament and the chance of a further referendum may disappear. To them I say: have confidence in your conviction.
“There is no reason why we cannot take support for independence to far greater levels than hitherto in the next four years. Besides, if there are not the numbers to elect an independence-supporting Scottish government, then there ain’t the numbers to win a referendum in any event.
“Realistically I think those who seek independence need a plan which works backwards from 2021 ... we need a new case for independence which builds on the old. A case which answers questions left unanswered last time and takes account of changes in the world since.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel