ROGER Federer, Rafael Nadal and the ever-increasing possibility of a US Open meeting between the two were all overshadowed at Flushing Meadows early yesterday morning by an extraordinary fightback from Juan Martin del Potro.
The 2009 champion has been struggling with illness and won only three games in the opening two sets against sixth seed Dominic Thiem.
It seemed doubtful whether Del Potro would even be able to complete the match but he did much more than that.
The Argentinian raced through the third set, saved two match points with aces in the fourth and then clinched the fifth to win 1-6, 2-6, 6-1, 7-6 (7/1), 6-4.
At his moment of victory, after HawkEye showed that Thiem had served a double fault, Del Potro stood with head back and arms aloft as his legions of supporters on Grandstand roared.
On-court interviewer Pam Shriver had to wait for the ‘Ole’ chants to die down before posing the question of just how he was able to win the match.
“Oh my God,” said the 22nd seed, who now must try to recover for a quarter-final clash with Federer in a rematch of their 2009 final.
Federer is used to being the main attraction but he could hear that attention was elsewhere as the noise from Grandstand drifted across to Arthur Ashe, where he was engaged in a routine 6-4, 6-2, 7-5 victory over Philipp Kohlschreiber.
Del Potro was one of the most popular players on tour even before his two long lay-offs with wrist problems, the most recent of which he feared would end his career.
It has been a very long road back, and Del Potro still cannot hit his backhand how he used to, but his heavyweight punch of a forehand remains one of the sport’s great weapons.
He began to land blows on Thiem in the third set and was an early break up in the fourth before the Austrian moved to the brink of victory.
Thiem showed tremendous heart with thousands of fans screaming against him but his nerve let him down at the vital moment as, from 5-3, 30-0, he allowed Del Potro to break back.
The 28-year-old clinched the tie-break with a forehand so powerful it took the break away, and in the fifth set simply refused to let his efforts be in vain.
Del Potro said: “I was trying to retire the match in the second set. Then I saw the crowd waiting for more tennis, waiting for my good forehands, good serves. I took all that energy to change in a good way and think about fighting and not retiring.
“I think I did everything well after the third set. The crowd enjoyed with me all the points. It was an unbelievable atmosphere.”
Federer and Del Potro have not played at Flushing Meadows since the final eight years ago, when the Argentinian recovered from two sets to one down to win his only grand slam title.
Whether he will have the energy to do the same again must be very doubtful.
He said: “I feel tired. We cannot do magic. But hopefully my day off tomorrow I can recover a little bit more. Then I will see if I’m ready to play in good conditions against Roger.”
Having been well below his best in five-set wins over Frances Tiafoe and Mikhail Youzhny in the first two rounds, Federer appeared to have shrugged off concerns over his form and fitness by easing past Feliciano Lopez.
There were no worries on the first score again here but Federer caused alarm for his fans by taking an off-court medical time-out at the end of the second set.
He explained afterwards it had been tightness in a muscle in his bottom, but added: “It’s all good. No problems there. I’m not worried about it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here