SCOTLAND'S statisticians have become less independent since devolution, experts have warned.
Economists said they questioned whether Scotland's chief statistician could speak out if figures were being misused.
The discussion at a meeting of Holyrood's Economy Committee follows the UK Statistics Authority chairman Sir David Norgrove publicly rebuking Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson over his revival of the discredited claim that Brexit would allow the UK to take back control of £350 million a week.
Green MSP Andy Wightman suggested that could not be done in Scotland "because there is nobody of that nature commenting, at least on Scottish statistics".
Economist Margaret Cuthbert said: "We actually did have much more independence on the chief statistician speaking out in Scotland prior to devolution.
"That particular time he or she ... could always go directly to the head of ONS (Office for National Statistics) and stand up for the quality of statistics. That went with devolution."
Richard Marsh, director of 4-Consulting, said the national accounts team should be "more independent" of government, adding: "It hasn't been independent since devolution."
He said it was "very worrying" that last year's Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) figures, were "preempted" by the publication of a government paper on the cost of Brexit to Scotland.
"Unlike the situation over the weekend, the statistics regulator didn't say anything, it wasn't called up as a potential breach of the code of conduct, and perhaps more importantly, Scotland's chief statistician didn't say anything," he said.
"So if you have an independent statistics body covering the UK saying they are disappointed and surprised at someone confusing a gross and net figure, the chief statistician you'd suspect would be furious, or as close to furious as a statistician can get, that someone's tried to preempt - that someone within his own organisation - has sought to preempt a kite-mark publication."
Meanwhile Professor Richard Murphy, director of Tax Research UK, told the committee some British overseas territories had better statistics than Scotland.
He said: "I think there will be some statistics they produce, not many, that will be better than Scotland and I think in the case of Jersey many of the statistics will be substantially better than Scotland.
"If that island can produce better data which is more decision useful probably than that which is available to many Scottish politicians, I think it's something that needs to be thought about seriously."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel