THE Scottish Professional Football League has scrapped plans for an independent review into the Rangers tax case.
The SPFL board took the decision yesterday after the Scottish Football Association rejected its call for the authorities to co-operate on a review into how they handled the case and other tax issues involving Scottish football clubs.
Chairman Murdoch MacLennan said: “The SPFL board has been clear that any meaningful review would have had to be carried out in association with the Scottish FA and with the full and active co-operation of both organisations.
“The SPFL board has therefore concluded that it cannot, by itself, take forward an effective independent review.”
In a statement, the SPFL board said it was “disappointed” in the SFA’s decision not to take part in a review.
It had called for the review after the Supreme Court ruled Rangers should have paid tax on about £50 million of payments to players and other staff during the first decade of the century.
It continued: “The SPFL board still believes that an independent review, promoted jointly by the Scottish FA and SPFL, would have resulted in a better understanding of the procedures and processes adopted by football’s governing bodies. Such a review would also have enabled any lessons learned to be implemented for the future benefit of the game in Scotland.”
Both bodies may still be the subject of scrutiny with plans for a fan-funded judicial review apparently progressing.
Rangers were fined £250,000 by the Scottish Premier League in 2013 after the oldco club failed to disclose dozens of payments to players in breach of regulations, but a commission led by judge Lord Nimmo Smith declared they had gained no “unfair competitive advantage”.
Both the governing body and the league stated that legal advice meant there was no recourse for further disciplinary action following the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in July.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here