LONG-running cracks at the top of the right-wing, anti-migrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party widened yesterday despite its relative success in Sunday’s election.
Co-chairwoman Frauke Petry – one of AfD’s best-known faces, but sidelined over recent months – stormed out of a press conference.
She said: “An anarchic party ... can be successful in opposition, but it cannot make voters a credible offer for government.”
Petry added that she would not join AfD’s parliamentary caucus, and walked out of the room without taking questions.
Co-chairman Joerg Meuthen apologised “on behalf of the party” for the episode, saying it was “not discussed with us”, before moving on.
Meanwhile, the mainstream parties have all ruled out teaming up with AfD, which is one of six caucuses in the new parliament after winning 12.6 per cent of the vote. Including the seat Petry won, it has 94 of the 709 seats.
Co-leader Alice Weidel told reporters the party’s plan was to provide “constructive opposition”.
She said: “We have a very clear mandate from the voters, and there is no time to waste.”
AfD drew support from people who previously voted for Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservative bloc and from many who did not previously vote at all.
To a lesser extent, it also drained support from the centre-left Social Democrats and others.
Its success followed a campaign focused on criticism of Merkel’s decision to open the country’s doors to more than one million asylum seekers over the past two years.
AfD performed most strongly in Germany’s formerly communist and less prosperous east, capturing 22.5 per cent of the vote there – and 27 per cent among male voters.
In the eastern town of Bautzen, which saw clashes last year between residents and migrants, Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) lost a seat it had held for more than 25 years to AfD, whose candidate received 32.8 per cent of the vote.
Bautzen is located in Saxony, Petry’s home state and long an AfD stronghold. Across the state, AfD narrowly topped Merkel’s CDU to become the strongest party, winning 27 per cent of the vote.
Petry turned AfD from opposing eurozone bailouts to a focus on migration after she ousted the party’s founding leader in 2015, but has recently been sidelined after urging AfD to exclude members who express extremist views, with the aim of attracting moderate voters.
While she said she would not join the parliamentary group, she did not say she was leaving the party.
Co-leader Alexander Gauland sought to allay fears expressed by Jewish groups about his party’s success. US-based Jewish rights organisation the Anti-Defamation League called the AfD result a “disturbing milestone”, saying “its leaders have made anti-Semitic statements and played down the evil of the Nazi regime”.
Among other statements that have caused concern, AfD’s leader in Thuringia state, Bernd Hoecke, called for a “U-turn” in the way Germany remembers its Nazi past, while Gauland has repeatedly insisted “we have the right to be proud of the achievements of Germans soldiers in two world wars”.
However, Gauland insisted that “there is nothing in our party, in our programme, that could disturb the Jewish people who live here in Germany”.
He added that he had not met with Jewish leaders, but was “ready at any time” to do so.
Gauland also dismissed concerns that AfD’s rise was somehow linked to a wider swing to the right in Europe and the US.
French far-right leader Marine Le Pen and the Netherlands’ Geert Wilders both were quick to congratulate AfD on entering parliament.
However, Gauland said: “I don’t think that these parties are at all comparable, and that there is some kind of a mobilisation of nationalist parties across Europe.”
“Mr Trump has neither helped us nor hindered us, because we have different problems from the Americans, and Ms Le Pen’s defeat in the end didn’t hurt us because France has different problems.”
Gauland said Austria’s right-wing Freedom Party is “the only party where there is a closer relationship”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel