RIVAL camps in the Scottish Labour leadership race clashed last night after accusations of a trade-union stich up were made against Richard Leaonard.
Leonard, who is known for his connections to trade unions, was forced to deny that Len McCluskey's Unite was working to game the system in order to get the Corbyn-supporting candidate elected.
The claim followed reports that 2,700 member of Unite had signed up to the union's political levy in just two days, giving them the opportunity to vote in the Labour leadership election.
The increase in members contributing to the levy came following a text and email campaign, and sit on top of the 5,000 levy-payers the union already has.
Sources close to Sarwar claimed that Scottish labour activists "wouldn't take kindly" to any interference from the union.
Leonard told the Herald that he did not think the surge of levy-paying union members would have any impact on the leadership election result.
He stated: “There are 21,000 members of the Labour Party and they will determine who the next leader of the Scottish Labour Party is and I’m quite happy to make my appeal to them and for them to be the judges of me on my policies, the consistency of my politics and the values I hold."
Leonard now has the backing of four major unions: Unite, Usdaw, TSSA and Aslef. Unison is due to meet today to decide who it will back, though it is expected that Leonard will be the candidate.
The left-wing candidate has voiced gratitude to the support he has recived from the trade unions, as well as the grassroot membership.
“The trade unions set the Labour Party up and trade union members are the very people that the Labour Party should be reaching out to and any trade union members who are considering becoming affiliated supporters should consider becoming full members of the Labour Party because that’s where they belong,” he explained.
Anas Sarwar's team have voiced concern that the unions could swing the vote in Leonard's favour.
A senior source close to the Glasgow MSP said: “Scottish Labour fought hard for its autonomy from the UK party. Members won’t take kindly to any attempt by Unite to return Scottish Labour to a branch office.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here