ROHINGYA refugees had no food but were in sight of land when their ship was wrecked with the loss of scores of lives, an official said.
The International Organisation for Migration, a group attached to the UN, said more than 60 people were confirmed or presumed dead after fleeing violence in Burma towards Bangladesh.
Spokesman Joel Millman said the “very tragic” accident involved a vessel that had been at sea for two days with no food and had faced choppy seas.
The Bangladeshi captain had not charged the passengers any fee for the transport and had been trying to avoid sea patrols or checkpoints, he said.
“The details are absolutely astonishing and remarkable,” Millman added. “At one point, he [the captain] chose to anchor the vessel, but that proved to be a fatal mistake as the rough seas were much worse than he supposed. This was easily within sight of land.”
“People were actually quite distraught that they had gotten so close to safety and yet drowned because the boat was destroyed by the high seas and the torrential rains and wind,” he said.
Millman said 23 deaths have been confirmed after eight more bodies were found overnight following an initial count of 15.
Based on interviews with survivors, Millman said: “We believe 40 are missing and presumed drowned” on the vessel, which was thought to have been carrying about 80 people.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here