A HOLYROOD committee has called for improvements to the way boards of public-sector bodies are run following a “steady stream of critical reports”.
The Public Audit Committee set out its concerns in a letter to the Finance Secretary Derek Mackay, highlighting the example of “significant governance failings” at the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) that eventually resulted in its chairman Andrew Flanagan announcing his resignation.
It also cited reports from current and previous auditors general on problems of governance and financial management at various public bodies over many years.
Meanwhile, many of the criticisms of the structure and operation of public bodies’ boards set out in a 2010 audit report on the role of boards are still valid today, the committee said.
Concerns highlighted by the committee included board members feeling inhibited from challenging board chairs or chief executives, a lack of redress for members if the chief executive or chair is performing poorly, and the lack of an effective and transparent means of assessing performance.
The committee set out several measures to address these problems, including the involvement of a senior independent director on a board as a “check and balance” on the performance of the chair or chief executive.
Its letter also pointed to issues around appointments, and called for a simple and streamlined process to attract well-qualified people with a successful track record in the public, private and third sectors rather than “those who are most adept at repeating public-sector jargon”.
Acting Convener Jackie Baillie MSP said: “Our committee wants to be reassured that Scotland’s public bodies are spending public money wisely and delivering the best possible outcomes for the people they serve.
“In order to do so, they must be led by a well-functioning board with clear lines of responsibility and accountability.
“However, there’s been a steady stream of critical reports for many years now, highlighting often serious governance failings in public bodies.”
“It is not in anyone’s interest for there to be constant critical reports about our public bodies.
“This is why we’ve suggested several ways in which boards could be made more effective, and have also called on the Scottish Government to demonstrate leadership by explaining how it tries to bring about improvements in governance and performance.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “Public bodies are important to the delivery and transformation of public services, therefore they need to be led by highly effective boards.
“As the committee notes, the proportion of organisations subject to critical audit reports is very small. However, public bodies must continue to improve performance in order to deliver a service that is high-quality, efficient and responsive to local people’s needs. We will consider the committee’s letter and its recommendations carefully.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here