AS Richard Cockerill yesterday promised to go to the grave fighting for the rights of his teams, the Edinburgh head coach offered what amounted to a teatise on the difficulty of the role of match officials in his sport
Rugby union’s unique selling point has always been the nature of the contest for possession in its various elements – scrum, lineout, tackle, ruck, maul and re-start – requiring players to repeatedly push to beyond the limits of its laws.
That leaves referees constantly having to make judgment calls between offences in terms of which have been worse or have unfairly affected the outcome and, in Cockerill’s view, means they are favouring the team they expect to win matches.
While he acknowledged that has always tended to be so and, implicitly, that Edinburgh are a long way from being entitled to be viewed as favourites he insisted that he was entitled to fight for their right to even-handed treatment.
“There’s nothing wrong with asking that and if there is, then I’ll just keep saying it until they shoot me,” said Cockerill. “It’s the only time I’ll be quiet, if I’m dead. It’s not a problem for me. That’s my job – to make sure that this team gets as fair a crack at the job as the next team.”
Which is fair enough and he has had what he described as “private” dialogue with the PRO14’s referees chief about it. However, funnily enough, the former England hooker admitted that he did not think quite the same way when he was playing for and coaching the biggest clubs in Europe.
“It’s always better when you’re the person getting the benefit,” he acknowledged.
“It happens both ways – I’ve had situations at Leicester and Toulon where referees come to the home ground and referee differently because they don’t want to seem to be intimidated by the stadium. It depends which side you’re fighting for. My agenda is Edinburgh. I’m going to stand my corner for my team and I think there’s a fair argument to discuss.”
After a promising start which saw them win on the road then at home on his first two games in charge, Cockerill has had confirmation of the task facing him in the past three weekends in terms of what he and his players have to do better, noting that:
“We’ve got to make sure that we keep developing what we’re doing. I’m never going to blame the referee for the result. We’ve got to be good enough to control that ourselves.”
While Cockerill stated before the season that wins rather than performances were his priority he is also willing to admit that, in terms of expectations, the only major slip up so far has been when blowing a 14-point lead at home to Benetton Treviso.
He knows that the more they can get themselves into those positions the more likely they are to be dependent on referees to see things their way, but what they need to focus on first is getting themselves there.
“The key parts in the last two weeks are that we’ve shown we can stay in the battle against good teams. Now we need to play with that intensity and intent, with and without the ball, when it’s a team we should beat.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here