A JAPANESE court has ordered the government and the operator of the Fukushima nuclear plant to pay 500 million yen (£3.4 million) to thousands of former residents who demanded damages for their livelihoods lost in the 2011 nuclear crisis.
Fukushima District Court said yesterday that the government had failed to order Tokyo Electric Power Co (Tepco) to improve safety measures despite knowing as early as 2002 of a risk of a massive tsunami in the region.
The court upheld the plaintiffs’ argument that the disaster could have been prevented if the economy and industry ministry had ordered Tepco to move emergency diesel generators from the basement to higher ground and make the reactor buildings water-tight based on 2002 data which suggested there was a risk of a tsunami as high as 51ft (15.7m).
The plaintiffs had also argued that Tepco ignored another chance to take safety measures when a government study group warned in 2008 of a major tsunami triggering a power outage at the plant.
The tsunami that swept into the plant on March 11 2011 following an earthquake knocked out the reactors’ cooling system and destroyed the back-up generators which could have kept it running and kept the nuclear fuel stable.
The government and the utility have argued that a tsunami as high as the one that occurred could not have been anticipated and that the accident was unavoidable.
Yesterday’s ruling, however, dismissed the plaintiffs’ demand that radiation levels in their former neighbourhoods be reduced to pre-disaster levels.
The 3800 plaintiffs who sued in 2015 comprise the largest group among about 30 similar lawsuits involving 12,000 people pending across Japan.
It was the second verdict that held the government accountable over the Fukushima meltdowns, following a decision in March by the Maebashi District Court.
Maebashi District Court ordered the government and Tepco to pay damages ranging from 70,000 yen (£475) to 3.5 million yen (£23,665) to 62 plaintiffs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here