The UK Government's EU Withdrawal Bill has two major flaws which make it "fatal" to devolution, Scotland's Brexit Minister has said.
Michael Russell told MPs the proposed legislation "breaks the devolution understanding that what is not reserved is devolved" and would enable UK Ministers to make alterations to Scottish legislation without scrutiny at Holyrood.
The Bill to transpose EU law into British law involves responsibilities in devolved areas being initially transferred to Westminster, resulting in the Scottish and Welsh administrations joining together to refuse to grant consent to the bill as it stands.
Giving evidence to Westminster's Scottish Affairs Committee on the impact of the Bill on devolution, Russell said: "We and the Welsh have taken the position on two issues which we believe are fatal to devolution."
He said if legislative amendments are made to address these two areas the Scottish Government would bring forward a legislative consent motion which it believes the Scottish Parliament would support, and currently all parties at Holyrood are involved in talks on the issue.
He added: "We don't have a solution as yet, within the Scottish Parliament to that, but we are talking and we are also talking to the UK Government to try and find a way to overcome what are we believe fatal flaws in the Bill as far as devolution is concerned.
"The reason there is that cooperation is because this is not about the SNP and it's not about a single party. It is about devolution which all the parties have made work over the last 20 years.
"I think that's the key issue. No matter what position you take on the big questions in Scottish Politics, all the parties work together to make devolution work and to make the parliament work.
"We believe this bill contains things that would make that much more difficult and would reduce the ability of the parliament to serve the people of Scotland."
Liberal Democrat Christine Jardine asked the minister: "There is a contradiction between being quite happy to work within that European framework but when the powerbase moves to Westminster it's not acceptable, so could you explain the difference?"
Russell denied this is the case and said decisions taken in the European Union were co-decisions but said there is no proposal in the EU Withdrawal Bill for this, adding that EU frameworks were discussed, not imposed.
He continued: "This Bill decides to override devolution."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel