HONG Kong’s leader has said its residents are obliged to reject threats to China’s sovereignty, in what appeared to be a veiled warning aimed at rising separatist sentiment.
Chief executive Carrie Lam made the remarks in a policy speech carefully calibrated to avoid touching on politically controversial topics.
She did not specifically mention simmering tensions over the Chinese-controlled city’s burgeoning independence movement or football fans booing the national anthem.
Those issues are part of residents’ broader fears about Beijing’s tightening grip on the semi-autonomous city and erosion of its distinctive Cantonese identity.
As she spoke, a British rights activist was reportedly denied entry to Hong Kong, further underlining those concerns.
Lam, elected by a committee of mostly pro-Beijing Hong Kong elites earlier this year, said residents have “the obligation to say ‘no’ to any attempt to threaten our country’s sovereignty, security and development interests, as well as the duty to nurture our next generation into citizens with a sense of national identity”.
The Chinese central government’s recent passage of a law making it illegal to improperly use China’s national anthem, punishable by up to 15 days in prison, raised fears it could be used to undermine freedom of speech in Hong Kong.
It has become common at football games for some fans to jeer the Chinese national anthem as a way to express their unhappiness with Beijing.
At an Asian Cup qualifying match between Hong Kong and Malaysia on Tuesday night, fans raucously expressed their opposition to the anthem, with many turning their backs when March Of The Volunteers was played before the game.
Some held up a banner calling for Hong Kong independence in bold white lettering.
The new law still needs to be adopted in Hong Kong, and it is unclear how it will be implemented in the city, which has a separate legal system from the mainland.
Earlier this year Chinese president Xi Jinping warned against separatist sentiment, saying it was a “red line” that should not be crossed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here