WHISKY sales in the UK have plummeted after Chancellor Philip Hammond hiked excise duty on a bottle by 36p in March’s Budget.
Official figures show 36.7 million bottles were released for sale in the first six months of 2017, down by one million from the same period in the previous year.
The figures, taken from HM Revenue and Customs, also show the move has been counter-productive, with overall tax take from spirits falling since the Budget increase.
READ MORE: Theresa May slammed after declaring that Universal Credit is 'working'
Spirits revenue dropped by more than seven per cent in the first financial quarter of 2017/18, down to £697 million compared to £751m in the same period from April to the end of June the previous year.
In 2016, when excise duty was frozen, there was a seven per cent increase in spirits revenue, boosting the Treasury’s coffers by £229m.
A two per cent cut in spirits tax in 2015 led to a four per cent rise in revenue, a £124m increase.
The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) will today launch a campaign called Drop the Dram Duty, urging Hammond to cut tax on spirits when he delivers his Autumn Budget on November 22.
According to the SWA, the Chancellor’s 3.9 per cent increase, means that the price of an average bottle of Scotch is now 80 per cent tax.
For a bottle costing £12.77, £8.05 in excise duty and £2.13 in VAT will go to the taxman.
Karen Betts, Scotch Whisky Association chief executive, said: “Philip Hammond’s damaging 3.9 per cent spirits duty hike has hit UK demand for Scotch and seen less money going to the Treasury.
“The Chancellor should use his November Budget to Drop The Dram Duty and boost a great British success story.
“Cutting tax would send a strong signal that the Government believes in a world-famous UK manufacturing industry which supports 40,000 jobs and plays a key role in Scotland’s economy.”
When Hammond announced the excise duty rise in the spring, Charles Ireland, drinks giant Diageo’s general manager Great Britain, Ireland and France, predicted it would lead to a reduction in tax revenue.
He says the Government needs to do more support the drink. Ireland said: “Scotch is the heart of our business. We want it to prosper both at home and abroad.
“This week, we announced we are bringing Port Ellen and Brora distilleries back to life, which is a further testament to our desire to nurture and build Scotch.
“We believe consumers in the UK are being taxed unfairly and are calling on the UK Government to support Scotch domestically and as an iconic export.”
MP Hannah Bardell, the SNP’s international trade spokeswoman said: “These figures are deeply worrying, but hardly surprising given the Chancellor’s completely unjustified and damaging hike in duty in March. Demand has slumped because of his actions and Philip Hammond is now getting less into the Treasury coffers because of it.
‘’He has to listen to the calls to reverse his decision in next month. This is all before we even factor in the possible catastrophe of a no-deal Brexit and we can only imagine what that might bring to Scotland’s food and drink sector.’’
The Treasury pointed out that more than 90 per cent of Scotch whisky is exported, and that companies don’t pay alcohol duty on those sales.
A spokeswoman said: “We recognise the importance of the Scotch whisky industry. In the UK, tax on a bottle of Scotch is 90p lower now than it would have otherwise been, thanks to duty freezes and cuts introduced in the last three years.”
Recent research by the SWA says the sector directly contributes more than £3.2 billion to the Scottish economy, and accounts for 60 per cent of the entire food and drink sector.
Employment associated with Scotch whisky in the UK is just below 40,200, with most of those jobs in Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel