SCOTTISH Labour's leadership hopefuls have focused on gender equality as the contest to succeed Kezia Dugdale continues.
Anas Sarwar has promised to help women who have been adversely affected by state pension age increases.
He said new powers over social security coming to Holyrood could be used to mitigate changes, pledging to lodge amendments to the Social Security Bill to allow a Scottish Pension Credit to be introduced.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour civil war turns even nastier as both sides claim vote is rigged
Plans to increase the state pension age for women from 60 to 65 between 2010 and 2020 were initially set out in 1995.
But the coalition government decided to speed up the process in 2011, resulting in the state pension age for women due to increase to 65 in November 2018 and to 66 by October 2020.
Campaigners argue women affected have had to rethink their retirement plans at relatively short notice.
"Thousands of women born in the 1950s have been left facing real financial difficulty because of the lack of notice given by the cruel Tory government about changes to the state pension," Sarwar said.
"We need urgent action to end the hardship faced by women who have worked all their lives and find that they cannot retire as planned."
Meanwhile his rival Richard Leonard has promised to address the gender gap in subject choices at school and beyond by creating a "gender equality training standard" for current and new teachers to help eliminate gender bias in classrooms.
He has also proposed the "targeted use of gender quotas in modern apprenticeships where there is a high level of occupational segregation such as social care and construction".
"The trade union movement has a history of elevating the voice of women workers, but women remain under-represented and underpaid," he said.
"Occupational gender segregation is at the heart of gender inequality.
"High levels of segregation are a significant factor in the discrepancy between the wages of women and men, the majority of the care, cleaning or administration workforce are women and they are undervalued and underpaid. This must change."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel