WOMEN’S rights groups in Portugal have reacted angrily to a court decision that quoted the Bible in justifying a suspended sentence for a man convicted of assaulting his ex-wife with a spiked bat because of alleged adultery.
The man was given a 15-month suspended sentence and a fine of €1750 (£1560) for using a bat spiked with nails to assault the woman in the street in 2015, leaving her covered in cuts and bruises, after she allegedly had an affair.
The prosecutor argued the sentence was too lenient and asked an appeal court for prison time of three years and six months, but judges rejected his request.
In a written ruling, the judges expressed “some understanding” for the attacker, saying a woman’s adultery is “a very serious offence against a man’s honour and dignity”.
They noted that the Bible says an adulterous woman should be punished by death and also cited a 1886 Portuguese law that gave only symbolic sentences to men who killed their wives for suspected adultery.
The judges at the appeal court in Porto, Portugal’s second-largest city, wrote that they were making reference to the Bible and an old law “to stress that a woman’s adultery amounts to conduct which society has always condemned and condemned very strongly”.
The written ruling became public this week and sparked outrage on Portuguese social media. The Women’s Alternative and Response Union described the ruling as unacceptable because it legitimised violence against women and blamed the victim.
It said the separation of powers in Portugal means there is no place for the Bible in the courts. The group plans to stage street protests on Friday.
Portugal’s Superior Magistrates Council, an oversight body, said it had taken note of the “vivid criticism from broad sections of public opinion”, but added that courts were independent and it could not intervene, even when faced with “archaic, inappropriate or unfortunate” comments by judges.
The woman could appeal to Portugal’s higher courts.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel