ANTHONY Joshua acknowledged the fact that having only 12 days to prepare for Carlos Takam contributed to his struggle to secure the explosive knockout expected of him.
Though he consistently dominated the latest defence of his IBF and WBA titles, he took until the 10th round to stop the previously little-known Frenchman, and to significant dissatisfaction.
The 36-year-old protested when referee Phil Edwards rescued him amid increasing punishment, Joshua refused to celebrate, and many of the estimated 76,000 present booed.
Takam’s resilience was even more impressive given he had replaced the injured Kubrat Pulev, a bigger and different style of fighter, with so little notice after the Bulgarian’s withdrawal through injury.
Despite neither Pulev nor Takam representing an opponent even near the status of Wladimir Klitschko, who Joshua had previously stopped, a world record crowd for an indoor fight had gathered under the roof at Cardiff’s Principality Stadium.
It was the entertaining stoppage of Klitschko that had created such high levels of expectation surrounding Joshua, 28, and the champion said: “Against Pulev, I’d have been able to have been a little bit more effective.
“Takam went down in the fourth; maybe Pulev wouldn’t have made it through the fourth.
“Takam was shorter, he knows how to ride that right hand; that’s what made it interesting with the change of opponent. He deals with guys like me every day in the gym.
“I have to go back to 2014 to think of guys I’ve sparred who are like Takam; I’m sparring big guys every other week, because there’s not so many short heavyweights.”
“It was just going to be a little bit more difficult but with him, certain mistakes I could have been making five fights ago I’m not going to make any more against someone like him. All they want to do is land one shot.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here