MYANMAR’s military issued its most forceful denial yet yesterday that security forces had committed atrocities during “clearance operations” in the west of the country which sparked the largest refugee crisis in Asia in decades.
In a statement, the military said it had interviewed thousands of people into the conduct of troops in Rakhine state after Rohingya insurgents launched a series of attacks there on August 25.
While the report acknowledged battles against militants from the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army, it claims security forces had “never shot at the innocent Bengalis” and “there was no death of innocent people”.
Myanmar’s government says members of the Muslim minority are “Bengalis” who migrated illegally from Bangladesh and do not acknowledge the Rohingya as a local ethnic group, even though they have lived in Myanmar for generations.
The latest denial contradicts consistent statements from refugees in Bangladesh who have described witnessing atrocities committed by security forces and Buddhist mobs. Those who have spoken to journalists and human rights groups accuse Myanmar’s security forces of massacres, rape, looting and the burning of hundreds of villages during the military operation.
The report comes ahead of a visit today by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson for talks on the crisis.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here