CYCLISTS say they would strongly oppose any move to make helmets compulsory after comments by transport minister Jesse Norman.
Speaking at a walking and cycling safety conference this week Norman did not rule out a forthcoming Government review making the use of helmets and high-visibility jackets compulsory.
But cycling groups fear the policy would cut the number taking to the road and point to research showing vehicles pass closer to bicycles when the user is wearing a helmet.
Norman said compulsory helmets would be looked at under the Cycle Safety Review set up after the case of Charlie Alliston, 20, jailed for 18 months after he killed pedestrian Kim Briggs as he cycled in London on a bike with no front brakes.
Boardman, whose cyclist mother Carol was killed in crash with a pickup truck in July last year, said: “The Cycle Safety Review will be based on evidence, and evidence shows that helmets do not make a significant difference to people’s safety.
More than 100 cyclists in total were killed on Britain’s roads in 2016, up two per cent on the previous year.
Sam Jones of Cycling UK said:”Making helmet-wearing compulsory ... could undermine levels of cycle use.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel